| Editor's
Note: the content of this Web article may be triggering for those
who self-injure.
Who does
it?
There is a general perception that SI is more prevalent among adolescent
girls and young women than among adolescent and adult males. However,
some studies have found similar rates in both males and females.[7]
It was suggested that the higher percentages of male self-injurers reported
in a few of the early studies might stem from expanding the definition
of SI to encompass high-risk activities likely to result in injury. However,
Klonsky, et. al., in their study of 2,000 Air Force recruits, found
virtually equal numbers of males (2.5%) and females (2.4%) responding
affirmatively to the statement “When I get very tense, hurting myself
physically somehow calms me down,” while more of the male (2.5%)
than female respondents (1.7%) agreed with the statement “I have hurt
myself on purpose several times.”[8]
As with depression, however, the number of female self-injurers seeking
help for the condition greatly exceeds that of males, resulting in the
standard description of the self-injurer as an intelligent, well-educated,
middle to upper middle class female in her mid-20s to early 30s who began
self-injuring in her teens.[9]
On average, respondents quoted in a survey by reported 50 acts of SI
and two thirds had cut or otherwise injured themselves within the preceding
month.[10]
The survey noted that 57 of the respondents had taken a drug overdose
and half of them had overdosed at least four times. Despite that early
finding, drug or alcohol overdosing is not generally included in the list
of self-injurious practices in the U.S, though it is included among the
predisposing factors to SI.
In Britain, where it is included, self-poisoning with non-prescription
medications is the most common form of deliberate self-harm.[11] The
explanation for that difference may lie in the definitions for the practice:
the British definition includes self-harm irrespective of the apparent
purpose,[12] while
the U.S. definition restricts self-injury to injury without intent
to commit suicide.[13] This
distinction renders British and U.S. statistics on the matter difficult
to compare.
Despite that broader definition, the recorded incidence of self-harm
in Britain is less than half that of the U.S. (400/100,000 population). [14] The
reported incidence of self-harm is even lower on the European
continent—193/100,00
females and 140/100,000 males, based on a definition similar
to that used in Britain.[15] The
ratio of female to male patients in Britain is about 50/50, suggesting
that the more recent U.S. studies showing less of a female bias among
self-injurers may reflect the current reality. As noted above, however,
any comparison should be treated with caution.
[7] Klonsky,
E., Olltmanns, T., and Turkheimer, E., Deliberate Self-Harm
in a Nonclinical Population: Prevalence and Psychological Correlates,
excerpted in Arehart-Treichel, J., Does Self-Harm Constitute
Unique Personality Disorder? Psychiatric News, September
19, 2003, p. 19. available at http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/38/18/19.
Accessed 1/5/2005
[11] House,
A., Owens, D., and Patchett, L., Deliberate Self Harm, in
Quality in Health Care, 1999, 8:137-143, available at http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/ehc46.pdf,
[14] Deliberate
Self Harm, p. 1.
home • about • order • contact • privacy • terms of use
© 2005 Syndistar,
Inc. All Rights Reserved.
|